Persilylation to Provide a Mixture Separable by Liquid-Liquid Extraction

 The KiloMentor blog emphasizes the usefulness of simple, robust, scalable methods for work-ups and isolations in organic chemical process development.

Biphasic organic solvent systems such as methanol/hexane can in principle be very useful for the simple extractive separation of components of a reaction mixture. The trick for success is to get partition ratios that are neither too small (<0.2) or too large (>5).

The idea being explored in this blog is whether persilylation of a mixture of solutes from a completed reaction could give a modified mixture that could be separated by liquid-liquid extraction between two immiscible aprotic solvents.

While it is true that most biphasic organic solvent systems comprise a protic component and such a solvent would use up all the silylating agent and prevent silylation, there are aprotic solvents that can be mixed and retain two liquid phases. Cyclohexane forms two liquid phases with any one of acetonitrile, propionitrile, nitromethane, nitropropane, dimethylsulfoxide, dimethylformamide or dimethylacetamide. Hexane and heptane would likely behave similar to cyclohexane.  Sulfolane and t-butyl methyl ether which are both aprotic and are only partially miscible. 

KiloMentor proposes that silylation of all the components of a mixture to be separated should decrease or leave unaltered their polarities and perhaps cause their partitioning between the component phases of a two-phase solvent pair to become more competitive. Smaller partition ratios could make a couple of stages of counter-current extraction feasible for a separation.

Disclaimer

Please be warned that this methodology has not been experimentally verified in any situation that I know about.  What I can say is it is simple enough to work and I cannot see any particular difficulty.

I have always urged my coworkers to make a clear distinction between facts and theory and this is my effort to do the same.

Making the Silylation Facile

To proceed in this way, a practical method to persilylate all the functional groups in all the components in a reaction mixture A necessary capability is is required. A practical consideration is that the silylation procedure must be inexpensive; otherwise, the additional reagent cost will make the procedure uncompetitive with alternatives.  Fortunately, it has long been known that there are catalysts for silylation, which allow chemists to use the convenient and inexpensive hexamethyldisilazane reagent for effectively all functional groups.  Although this has been in the literature for many years, it is infrequently used and seems to have today vanished from our chemical toolboxes.

Cornelis A. Bruynes and Theodorus K. Jurriens, then scientists at Gist-Brocades in Delft Netherlands, published a paper called Catalysts for Silylations with 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane in J. Org. Chem. 47, 3966-3969 1982.  They reported that the following compound types could be trimethylsilylated using the title reagent and an appropriate one of their catalysts with yields of typically more than 90%:

Alcohols, phenols, carboxylic acids, hydroxamic acids, carboxylic amides, and thioamides, sulfonamides, phosphoric amides, mono and dialkyl phosphates, mercaptans, hydrazines, amines, NH groups in heterocyclic rings, and enolizable β-diketones

The silylation times were in all cases no more than two hours and the catalyst concentration is typically from 0.001-10.0 mole percent.

Catalyst Structures

Although many catalysts are claimed (there is a corresponding patent  EP81200771.4 now expired), five were used in the most examples:

• Saccharin [81-07-2]
• Sodium saccharin [128-44-9]
• Bis(4-nitrophenyl)N-(4-toluenesulfonyl)phosphoramidate [81589-21-`]
• Tetraphenylimidodiphasphate [3848-53-1]
• Bis-(4-nitrophenyl)N-trichloroacetyl)phosphoramidate [38187-67-6]

The registry numbers for these catalysts are given in square brackets.

Methods of Application of this Idea

There are two variants of this idea. In one, all the solutes in a reaction mixture are persilylated and allowed to partition between the two immiscible solvents. In the second all the solutes in a reaction mixture are mixed with the two immiscible solvents and the silyating reagents are added and the mixture is analyzed as the competitive silylations proceed and the partitioning of unsilylated, partially silylated, and completely silylated materials accumulate in the two different phases. This second is a kinetic silylation with simultaneous partitioning. 

To use this either strategy all that ought to be necessary would be to

• make a solvent change into acetonitrile, propionitrile, dimethylacetamide, dimethylformamide, nitromethane or nitroethane whichever is appropriate for the separation trial
• add the minimum necessary amount of a catalyst
• add the calculated amount of hexamethyldisilazane
• heat for the requisite time to get a complete or other requisite degree of silylation of the mixture with the expulsion of the co-product ammonia
• adjust the solvent volumes so that the biphasic mixture will be produced at the appropriate temperature
• cool to that temperature if necessary
• separate the phases
• repeat extraction if necessary
• hydrolyze the silyl derivatives and recover the products from their respective phases

Potential Problems

It will only be determined by actual experiment with a particular mixture of solutes to determine how high a relative concentration of the solutes can be worked with before the biphasic solvent mixture goes homogeneous. Obviously, there is some point where the concentration of the solutes will wreck the balance of solvent properties that allows the two phases to coexist

As is always the case if one adds something to promote a separation that facilitating agent must itself be separated in the end. So it is with the catalyst, which must remain in one or the other phase along with some elements of the mixture being separated.

Consider the possibility of partitioning a reaction mixture between two of these partially immiscible solvents and then with mild stirring adding a silylation catalyst followed by an insufficient amount of a silylating agent such as hexamethyldisilazane.

What would happen?

I would think that whichever solute silylates faster will be partitioned into the less polar hydrocarbon layer where it would be protected from further reaction. The reagent trimethylsilyldiethylamine is probably the most statically demanding silylating agent one could try to get kinetically controlled silylation.

Extractive Crystallization-The Use of Methyl or Ethyl Salicylate to Crystallize Solutes Insoluble in both Hydrocarbon Liquids and Water

 The following is a research idea. As far as KiloMentor is aware It has not been demonstrated. Before any trials, an up-to-date literature search is recommended.

A very large number of organic compounds are essentially insoluble in both pure hydrocarbon solvents and in water. As such they would be expected to also be insoluble in a two-phase mixture of water and hydrocarbon. Solutes that belong to this large group would be candidates for a crystallization/recrystallization procedure that, as far as I know, has not been tried to date.

Methyl  and ethyl salicylates are very low melting solids and high boiling liquids: methyl salicylate mp -8.6 C; Bp 220-224 C; ethyl salicylate mp 1 C; Bp 232.5 C.

They share another common property. When stirred with aqueous alkali they are hydrolyzed to 2-hydroxybenzoate salts. What is less commonly recognized is that the presence of a separate hydrocarbon phase would not effectively inhibit this hydrolysis. The reason: the free phenolic substituent essentially drags the ester into the aqueous phase where the base attacks the ester functionality irreversibly after which it no longer has any affinity for the hydrocarbon layer. 

Unlike hydrocarbons or water, these compounds will be good solvents for a wide variety of other organic materials. They can interact using Van der Waal dispersion forces, dipole-dipole interactions, and hydrogen bonding using both the phenolic hydrogen bond donor and the ester carbonyl hydrogen bond acceptor. Furthermore, these compounds are not particularly expensive and are readily available at industrial scale. They have been demonstrated to be safe. Methyl and ethyl salicylates are flavoring and perfume chemicals. 

 
Suppose we choose to dissolve a solute of interest in a combination of a highly apolar poor solvent, like the hydrocarbon heptane for example, and as solubilizing agent methyl or ethyl salicylate. Such a combination will have the property of having a boiling point at least as high as the hydrocarbon used but will have the enhanced dissolving power provided by the additive. When the mixture is all a single solution it is cooled to ambient temperature and an immiscible aqueous solution of base is added. Even with only very weak stirring hydrolysis in the two-phase medium will result in the salicylate being taken into the aqueous phase. Now with its solubilizer degraded neither hydrocarbon nor aqueous phases will have appreciable solubility for the substrate so it should slowly crystallize out.

The mechanism by which the methyl or ethyl salicylate gets hydrolyzed and retained in the aqueous phase as carboxylate salt is the same extractive hydrolysis that was featured in another KiloMentor blog.

Wide Range of Acceptable Solutes

Even solutes containing functional groups sensitive to aqueous alkali can be expected to safely undergo this treatment. Molecules without active hydrogens (such as phenols, carboxylic acids) will not be extracted out of the hydrocarbon phase and so will be protected from significant alkaline hydrolysis.

Hypothetical Examples

An example of a preparation that might be improved using this methodology can be found in Organic Synthesis Col. Vol. 1 pg. 60 Anthrone Synthesis. The anthrone is finally crystallized from 3:1 benzene and petroleum ether. It is reported that about 12 g of the 3:1 mixture is required for each gram of anthrone.  The yield percent recovery is 62/82.5. An effort is made in this preparation to recycle mother liquors and this reuses about 2/3 of the liquid. The anthrone is much more soluble in benzene than in the petroleum ether antisolvent.  It would be interesting to see how the purification would proceed with heptanes as antisolvent and one of these hydroxyl benzoate esters as the solvent  with dissolution at the reflux temperature of heptanes.

Another opportunity to use this technology seems to be presented by the bromination of anthracene to 9, 10-dibromo anthracene. A process is described in Organic Synthesis Col. Vol. 1 pg. 207. This procedure uses carbon tetrachloride as solvent. This would be unacceptable in scale-up to-day since carbon tetrachloride is a recognized carcinogen.  It might work to brominates anthracene with bromine in heptanes. The dibrominated product is likely to be poorly soluble in heptanes and anthracene itself would only be somewhat better. In the heated reaction mixture, the anthracene would probably dissolve enough to allow the reaction to proceed. At the end, the crude dibromoanthracene would be precipitating. To recrystallize and recover the solvent one of our salicylates could be added with heating to get a solution; the combination then filtered hot; dilute aqueous alkaline to hydrolyze and extract  the hydroxyl benzoate ester. Since the 9, 10-dibromoanthracene would then become insoluble both in the aqueous and the hydrocarbon phases it would crystallize.

Other Possible applications

Other compounds from Organic Synthesis that could benefit from purification from a two-phase mixture of aq. alkali and high boiling hydrocarbon solvent: desoxybenzoin pg. 156: desyl chloride pg. 159; dibenzalacetone pg. 167; ethyl 2,3-dibromo-3-phenylpropionate pg. 270; m-nitroacetophenone pg. 434; Organic Synthesis Col. Vol. III acenaphthenequinone pg. 1; acenaphthenol-7 pg. 3;